bill
Amateur
Posts: 106
|
WAVE 3
Aug 30, 2011 21:22:23 GMT -5
Post by bill on Aug 30, 2011 21:22:23 GMT -5
Reporting that KTP & LAP workers voted overwhelmingly.....98.7% to authorize strike if the need arises.
|
|
|
WAVE 3
Aug 31, 2011 7:33:07 GMT -5
Post by Goldneye38 on Aug 31, 2011 7:33:07 GMT -5
Do we know how many voted?
|
|
|
WAVE 3
Aug 31, 2011 7:39:24 GMT -5
Post by goodtime on Aug 31, 2011 7:39:24 GMT -5
I'm just wondering what the other 1.3% were thinking?
|
|
|
WAVE 3
Aug 31, 2011 8:40:11 GMT -5
Post by ScottR@KTP on Aug 31, 2011 8:40:11 GMT -5
Those are the people that will oppose anything the union stands for...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
WAVE 3
Aug 31, 2011 9:41:23 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2011 9:41:23 GMT -5
Those are the people that will oppose anything the union stands for... Just curious, did the IUAW want us to vote for the strike or against it? I never heard what they wanted us to vote.
|
|
|
WAVE 3
Aug 31, 2011 9:51:43 GMT -5
Post by 06gt on Aug 31, 2011 9:51:43 GMT -5
Those are the people that will oppose anything the union stands for... Just curious, did the IUAW want us to vote for the strike or against it? I never heard what they wanted us to vote. That's not even a question that needs to be asked. A vote of yes on a strike is the only way they would ever want you to vote.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
WAVE 3
Aug 31, 2011 11:21:43 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Aug 31, 2011 11:21:43 GMT -5
Just curious, did the IUAW want us to vote for the strike or against it? I never heard what they wanted us to vote. That's not even a question that needs to be asked. A vote of yes on a strike is the only way they would ever want you to vote. Wasnt 100% sure. I figured King would of wanted us to vote against striking.
|
|
|
WAVE 3
Aug 31, 2011 12:59:00 GMT -5
Post by JoePieper on Aug 31, 2011 12:59:00 GMT -5
If that were the case they just wouldn't have had a strike vote.
|
|
|
WAVE 3
Aug 31, 2011 15:46:29 GMT -5
Post by driveshaftgrunt on Aug 31, 2011 15:46:29 GMT -5
The other 1.3% didn't understand the question.......
|
|
|
WAVE 3
Aug 31, 2011 15:48:10 GMT -5
Post by ScottR@KTP on Aug 31, 2011 15:48:10 GMT -5
Are you saying they are not smarter than a 5th grader?
|
|
|
WAVE 3
Aug 31, 2011 16:17:28 GMT -5
Post by Ktp1989 on Aug 31, 2011 16:17:28 GMT -5
The other 1.3% didn't understand the question....... The 1.3% probably figured the IUAW didn't have the nuts to strike so why should they vote for it...haven't went on strike in my 23 years....it's a meaningless vote. The threat of the stike makes the vote meaningful....there is NO threat with the UAW in any contract..especially this one.
|
|
|
WAVE 3
Aug 31, 2011 20:06:20 GMT -5
Post by 06gt on Aug 31, 2011 20:06:20 GMT -5
The 1.3% was the ones that showed up that pay child support. Child support is more than strike payments, ouch!
|
|
|
WAVE 3
Aug 31, 2011 21:58:09 GMT -5
Post by richatktp1 on Aug 31, 2011 21:58:09 GMT -5
Uaw strike vote - LAUGHABLE!!!
|
|
|
WAVE 3
Sept 1, 2011 0:08:08 GMT -5
Post by Dr. Death on Sept 1, 2011 0:08:08 GMT -5
The other 1.3% didn't understand the question.......
But they will be the first to gripe when we don't get crap!!!!!
|
|