|
|
Post by ktpelec on Jun 12, 2012 12:11:25 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by cal50 on Jun 12, 2012 14:56:53 GMT -5
Well to his credit Romney might have had issues with one state.
Obama has screwed all 50.
I like this video better of Obama supporters / voters.
|
|
|
|
Post by ktpelec on Jun 12, 2012 15:29:36 GMT -5
If Romney couldn't manage 1 state how is he going to manage 50?
In my opinion Obama inherited a screwed up country....it was way far gone when he took office. In spite of all the efforts of the Reps to make him look bad, at the expense of the middle and lower classes, he has made progress.
|
|
|
|
Post by cal50 on Jun 12, 2012 16:18:47 GMT -5
If Romney couldn't manage 1 state how is he going to manage 50? In my opinion Obama inherited a screwed up country....it was way far gone when he took office. In spite of all the efforts of the Reps to make him look bad, at the expense of the middle and lower classes, he has made progress. Yep, the country was bad and Obama made it worse. That's progress in the opposite direction, Bravo! Romney DID manage a state and Obama never ran anything on a local , city or state level so it really was a Hail Mary on Obama to succeed. If you have experience and have problems lets get a guy or gal with none and give them a crack at it. Jimmy Carter to his credit did run the state of Georgia. Romney had state budget and spending experience as well. Palin who is despised had the same level of experience. Obama had zero, nada, zip. So who is the least or under-qualified again??? Who was it that lost close to a billion on green energy? Added a record amount to the deficit ? Thinks the millions lost on stimulus and bailouts was "win" ? Romney made money in the private sector. Obama  Bain had a pretty good success percentage in companies it was involved with. Around 80% (?) ended up continuing on and doing well. What exactly are Obama’s success stories? Losing millions directly in tax dollars? Adding a record amount to the debt?? This is what you get when you give someone with no business experience or knowledge a blank check and lots of tries in guessing something correct. I doubt Obama has lost any of HIS money in ventures but he has no problem burning through OUR money in numerous failed business and stimulus attempts. He was and is grossly over his head in private sector and business ventures. I doubt it gets better dealing with foreign trade and more complex issues If you plan on voting for the guy knock yourself out. Trying to spin his poor performance on someone or anything else is weak. The Dems had control of all houses of government for a couple years. All they rammed through was Obama care which is under review by the supreme court. The prize jewel from a guy that lectured on constitutional could be overturned. With the economy, debt and now his legacy possibly going down the tubes as well your hero is not looking too good. |
|
|
|
Post by ktpelec on Jun 12, 2012 17:21:20 GMT -5
No the Dems do not have control over the House, and only a slight edge in the Senate.
Bain made money because Romney cut thousands of jobs... He has a long history of being a corporate raider, buying companies, cutting jobs for profit, sacrificing thousands of American families.
Jimmy Carter?? You have to go that far back...LOL
I see you omitted the last Rep "business" man that was in the White House... He started 2 wars that cost tax payers billions...and got thousands of US soldiers killed, but he did get the oil industry setup so they could make record profits... He added trillions to the deficit also...
I never said anything about Obama, you did...
My Topic is about Romney, and his dismal record in representing the working class American. I don't think we can stand another like him in control..
|
|
|
|
Post by cal50 on Jun 12, 2012 18:53:25 GMT -5
No the Dems do not have control over the House, and only a slight edge in the Senate. Bain made money because Romney cut thousands of jobs... He has a long history of being a corporate raider, buying companies, cutting jobs for profit, sacrificing thousands of American families. Jimmy Carter?? You have to go that far back...LOL I see you omitted the last Rep "business" man that was in the White House... He started 2 wars that cost tax payers billions...and got thousands of US soldiers killed, but he did get the oil industry setup so they could make record profits... He added trillions to the deficit also... I never said anything about Obama, you did... My Topic is about Romney, and his dismal record in representing the working class American. I don't think we can stand another like him in control.. You spin more than a washing machine. Good luck with the hope & change, lol. |
|
|
|
Post by ackspac on Jun 12, 2012 19:55:19 GMT -5
If Romney couldn't manage 1 state how is he going to manage 50? In my opinion Obama inherited a screwed up country....it was way far gone when he took office. In spite of all the efforts of the Reps to make him look bad, at the expense of the middle and lower classes, he has made progress. Yes he has! One step was by screwing us and giving Korea a sweet deal with their auto industry. Oh, and free trade with South America. Oh, and the failed "Green" movement that has lost billions of tax payers $$. Oh, and,,,,,,,,,, too much more to type  |
|
|
|
Post by ktpelec on Jun 12, 2012 21:17:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by marcus on Jun 19, 2012 8:11:34 GMT -5
I can't stand romney at all but I can't vote for a socialist
|
|
|
|
Post by ktpelec on Jun 19, 2012 10:59:47 GMT -5
We need a third choice in this country....
|
|
|
|
Post by cal50 on Jun 19, 2012 11:17:02 GMT -5
I can't stand romney at all but I can't vote for a socialist I am not a big Romney fan but Obama clearly does not know what the hell he is doing so the choice is simple, again. |
|
|
|
Post by uknowit on Jun 19, 2012 12:39:04 GMT -5
A vote for Romney is a vote to end your job, republicans aim is to crush unions and lower your pay. there is none so blind as those who will not see. And please look up the definition of socialist.
|
|
|
|
Post by cal50 on Jun 20, 2012 7:23:43 GMT -5
A vote for Romney is a vote to end your job, republicans aim is to crush unions and lower your pay. there is none so blind as those who will not see. And please look up the definition of socialist. Yawn.... (Standard response from a party line voting drone) The days of forced union membership Vs giving workers a choice is the best snap shot of how union members feel about their union. When members leave or opt out, by choice, its a real stretch and hard sell to blame any outside source or political party. The only way the UAW would be in demise if the members were given the choice of staying members or opting out. If people feel they are getting a good value for their dues paid the UAW has nothing to worry about. If people feel otherwise then a lot of blue shirts will be in the garage sale pile or shine rags for the car. With all union membership at >10% as a whole it shows that most working people do not feel unions have any benefit to them and that shows in the lack of organizing numbers. Again, try blaming this on a specific person or party shows your lack of reasoning skills. Its OK if you dislike Romney and feel he is the boogieman. Unless someone can get a handle on the US debt and get more people working union / non- union will not matter. This election it sure as hell is not Obama. |
|
|
|
Post by uknowit on Jun 20, 2012 13:42:21 GMT -5
Another brainwashed fox head
|
|
