|
|
Post by jobs1stb4polarbear on Jun 28, 2012 16:04:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by ackspac on Jun 28, 2012 16:41:37 GMT -5
We will end up paying for this in the long run. Just wait and see.  |
|
|
|
Post by justordered on Jun 28, 2012 20:12:17 GMT -5
we are paying for it now; people with no insurance going to the er and using it as their dr.
|
|
|
|
Post by cal50 on Jun 29, 2012 2:04:22 GMT -5
......another unfunded tax mandate for all of the working to pay.
(With thousands of new IRS agents to make sure)
The people not paying now will not be paying in the future either.
|
|
|
|
Post by tryingtomakeit on Jun 29, 2012 4:29:40 GMT -5
Enjoy the next 2+yrs of good health insurance, because after this contract is up, Ford will gladly pay the $2K fine per worker vs coughing up $8k or more per worker per year.
|
|
|
|
Post by marcus on Jun 29, 2012 4:48:34 GMT -5
He has the nerve to tell us it wont cost a dime more and the American people want it.Our healthcare will just go down and cost us more.People are blind.
|
|
|
|
Post by uknowit on Jun 29, 2012 12:41:23 GMT -5
They are blind Ray Charles
|
|
|
|
Post by driveshaftgrunt on Jul 15, 2012 12:00:15 GMT -5
The individual mandate is a conservative idea........a Heritage Foundation proposal, actually.
And taxing individual cadilac plans was John McCain's plan.
I'm just sayin........
FWIW, why am I taxed for not having kids?
The federal govt is making me pay TENS OF THOUSANDS of dollars more in taxes because I don't have kids. It's a tax on inactivity, which supports the idea that the commerce clause allows for tax on activity as well as inactivity. You chose to have kids, so I have to pay tens of thousands in federal income tax more because I didnt'?
And only one justice sided with the mandate based on a non-participation penalty.........the others rested on the commerce clause.
FWIW, Its a shitty law, only because the primary concern for the lawmakers that drafted this was the interests of the insurance and drug companies that stand to make all the bucks.......
|
|
