|
|
Post by TonyV on Oct 24, 2015 8:51:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by legacywannabe on Oct 24, 2015 10:39:12 GMT -5
This will be a mistake if the union get rid of the hiring caps and replace it with the 8 year progression simply because many will roll over next year if ford hires as many as expected. Most that will roll next year have about 4 to 5 years seniority
|
|
|
|
Post by ScottR@KTP on Oct 25, 2015 7:15:57 GMT -5
Ridiculous...the idea of an 8 tier system sucks even more....but at least they have a job...and they can reach full pay eventually, where now they had no hope with no caps at FCA.
|
|
|
|
Post by justaworker on Oct 25, 2015 22:03:59 GMT -5
Ridiculous...the idea of an 8 tier system sucks even more....but at least they have a job...and they can reach full pay eventually, where now they had no hope with no caps at FCA. only my opinion here, but i think if you do away with the 20% cap and create more tiers then thats a concessionary contract. |
|
|
|
Post by ScottR@KTP on Oct 26, 2015 5:02:29 GMT -5
You would be correct...
|
|
|
|
Post by bulldognuts on Oct 27, 2015 20:48:37 GMT -5
I don't know about other plants in the system,but LAP hired a shit load of people between 1988 and mid to late 90's.Many of these people will be retiring in the next 3 to 5 years. When that happens there will be a lot of people moving into top tier. I believe that it would be a huge mistake to allow Ford to remove caps. There is no way we should agree to any thing that stretched out over 8 years. Vote NO!!! to any contract that removes 20% cap or that has anymore than 2 tiers.
|
|
|
|
Post by caprudedawg on Oct 28, 2015 9:53:00 GMT -5
They're just putting it out there to get us to turn it down and then come back to the 20% cap and make it seem like they did something for us.
|
|
