|
Post by justaworker on Dec 13, 2015 19:22:29 GMT -5
Beause the only thing that's changed is how long it takes to top out. Back then, we weren't so negative so we assumed even through a different contract our pay would continue to progress and we would top out. Now, because we've been fucked alot, you feel they might be screwed. In reality, nothing has changed except the duration on the Progression. That's a fact, sorry. Well DUH ...We have a winner!!!Thats the whole argument????I don't trust the Co or union??God help! Well, I think "well duh". But you've spent two pages arguing the opposite.
|
|
|
Post by Ex-metalman on Dec 13, 2015 19:32:47 GMT -5
Well DUH ...We have a winner!!!Thats the whole argument????I don't trust the Co or union??God help! Hah bullshit. The whole argument was over you insisting that we were still operating under a 2-tier arrangement which any moron capable of reading the contract can see that we are not, yet you continued to ignore reality like a crazy person and insist that because people newly hired make less money than veteran workers there MUST be a second tier in place, even though when we hired in 20 years ago we WERE NOT under 2-tier but somehow new hires still made less than older workers, i.e. "progression"... Then you threw some extra bullshit out of left field claiming that the 3 year arrangement back then was somehow GUARANTEED even though most of hired in with under 3 years left in that agreement, knowing it would expire in 1996 and have to be renegotiated, so it wasn't any more GUARANTEED, as you claimed, than the arrangement is NOW. I'm very very sorry that you are either incapable of understanding the truth as it WAS AND IS, or incapable of being honest about it if you do understand it. This argument had nothing to do with opinion. People who honestly know the REAL TRUTH have, on occasion, a moral and ethical responsibility to correct outright lies and mob/sheep mentalities when they could become a threat to our cohesiveness as a union in the future. This is why I reluctantly got back on this board to break some balls because that seems to be the only language that is understood here by the people most in need of correction. I know you think that makes me an asshole, but I'd much rather be an asshole than a liar or a fool, because those 2 have much greater potential to be harmful to a great many more people, whereas the asshole, if right and looking out for the interests of the whole, can actually be helpful. I'm actually a very nice guy, around NORMAL people. Anyway, enough of this lecture. Until we meet again, Darth Bullshit! WAGER????And trust me mfer you'll never be the Asshole I'm capable of being...FU good bye ..We can try this again in 4 yrs...
|
|
|
Post by Ex-metalman on Dec 13, 2015 19:39:28 GMT -5
PS how about going away???You tried...Its ok ..Go put on your Star Wars PJs and play space invaders ...Bye Bye Boy
|
|
|
Post by turk182 on Dec 13, 2015 20:06:46 GMT -5
HA HA!
|
|
|
Post by laptier2 on Dec 13, 2015 21:54:09 GMT -5
Another fine enlightening thread for the ingrate bullshit mill. Hey just be thankful the profit sharing cap was REMOVED. Oh wait I forgot, we aren't supposed to be thankful for anything. Funny how all of you still work here, when you could obviously be so much more successful working somewhere else. So you think we will get above what the cap was?They removed it because we will never reach it...I think it's supposed to look like a gain?I guess for someone dumb enough to believe it? My thoughts exactly, the previous cap was $12,000 and never came close to that!!!!
|
|
|
Post by justaworker on Dec 14, 2015 5:02:31 GMT -5
So you think we will get above what the cap was?They removed it because we will never reach it...I think it's supposed to look like a gain?I guess for someone dumb enough to believe it? My thoughts exactly, the previous cap was $12,000 and never came close to that!!!! Just because you never came close to it, doesn't others didn't.
|
|
|
Post by beenaround on Dec 14, 2015 7:46:53 GMT -5
There wasn't a cap on what an individual could get.There was a cap on how much the company put in the pot per individual.
|
|
|
Post by Ex-metalman on Dec 16, 2015 19:17:04 GMT -5
There wasn't a cap on what an individual could get.There was a cap on how much the company put in the pot per individual. Maybe so ,but I did see 15,000 ..So what ever number that was for..
|
|