|
Post by ScottR@KTP on Mar 1, 2011 10:23:15 GMT -5
friend on frame text me 4 hrs?
|
|
|
Post by freaknnuts on Mar 1, 2011 10:49:22 GMT -5
I don't see why. Stacker has 316. Paint floor has 196. Some of C crew body went home early cause framer broke down.
|
|
|
Post by PUNISHER on Mar 1, 2011 11:05:45 GMT -5
chassis gone...trim gone...frame 1 gone....frame 2 headed out now
|
|
|
Post by olddude on Mar 1, 2011 11:38:18 GMT -5
Frame 1 went 4.3. No reason given. Working Saturday definite now.
|
|
|
Post by shortee on Mar 1, 2011 12:11:04 GMT -5
Well i guess night shift will get screwed again 10hrs.
|
|
gibby
New Member
Posts: 4
|
Post by gibby on Mar 1, 2011 12:32:00 GMT -5
Does this mean some folks are going to be on straight time SATURDAY ?? 40 hrs?? Or do they include short work week ??
|
|
|
Post by ktpelec on Mar 1, 2011 12:32:20 GMT -5
I was told it was a body shop break down, rather than drain the whole system running the rest of the shift they elected to stop and hope for the problem to be resolved so night could run. As of 12:30pm P-Stacker has 215 buildable units, 88 Us in the system with a few from Paint still due.
|
|
|
Post by kessinger on Mar 1, 2011 18:51:10 GMT -5
It was a 5 hour body breakdown.
Ok SWW code does count towards your 40 hours. So Saturday will be paid at time and 1/2, but every hour you work will come out of the SWW payout since it was OT scheduled prior to the downtime. So you'll get paid at time 1/2 but lose your SWW pay.
|
|
|
Post by ctopher on Mar 2, 2011 0:39:39 GMT -5
So why couldn't day shift run today? Earlier post said stacker had 316.
|
|
|
Post by lilbear on Mar 2, 2011 14:50:56 GMT -5
so is body shop & paint still having trouble? went 8.1 & 8.3 today? night shift 10 hrs last night, probably the same tonight!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by ktpschd on Mar 2, 2011 15:59:54 GMT -5
The problem isn't the number of jobs in the stacker, it's the mix. We had over 300 in the stacker but no jobs for line 2. All units were scheduled for line 1 and there were no jobs to swap to line 2. Only 4 X 2's can schedule down line 2 and all we had in the stacker were 4 X 4's. The HK system (stacker) shuts down if it asks for a particular type of unit and none is available. From what I understand, a supplier had problems shipping parts for 4 X 2's so the mix was flooded with 4 X 4's, What part? Dunno....Are the parts on the way? Dunno...Just explaining why the mix in the stacker is more important than the number of jobs in the stacker.
|
|
|
Post by SHOGurl on Mar 2, 2011 16:23:34 GMT -5
Well, that seems a bit odd to me. We've been running an over 50% 4x2 mix on frame 1 and have been for the last 3 days.
|
|
|
Post by fordmakesnosense on Mar 2, 2011 16:59:25 GMT -5
sounds mixed up if you ask me..lol
|
|
|
Post by ktpschd on Mar 2, 2011 17:11:41 GMT -5
Why odd SHOGurl? We've been swapping jobs to line 2 the last 3 days to accommodate the mix. We simply ran out of line 2 jobs this afternoon at around 1:10pm. Just because we have been running a 50% doesn't mean we can continue to without the correct mix. Stop by J-33 sometime and I'll be glad to explain how the stacker works. Constraints, job mix, adjusting 8502's for line allocation, ASC ratios, etc.
|
|
|
Post by SHOGurl on Mar 2, 2011 17:21:04 GMT -5
"From what I understand, a supplier had problems shipping parts for 4 X 2's so the mix was flooded with 4 X 4's"
This is what I find "odd". Provided I am reading it correctly, how are we(frame 1) "flooded with 4x4's" when we(frame 1) are running a predominantly 4x2 mix? A typical mix for frame 1 is 1/3 4x2's or less. An over 50% 4x2 mix is quite excessive.
|
|
|
Post by ktpschd on Mar 2, 2011 20:01:50 GMT -5
When I said, "flooded with 4 x 4's", I was referring to units coming from paint into the stacker. Not scheduled out to the lines.
|
|
|
Post by SHOGurl on Mar 2, 2011 21:53:31 GMT -5
And, therein, lies the miscommunication. Thank you for clarifying. ;D
|
|
|
Post by ktpelec on Mar 3, 2011 12:32:37 GMT -5
Just because we have been running a 50% doesn't mean we can continue to without the correct mix. Stop by J-33 sometime and I'll be glad to explain how the stacker works. Constraints, job mix, adjusting 8502's for line allocation, ASC ratios, etc. And here all along I thought it was, "eenie, meenie, minee, mo...." LOL
|
|
|
Post by ktpsparky on Mar 3, 2011 12:55:36 GMT -5
The problem isn't the number of jobs in the stacker, it's the mix. We had over 300 in the stacker but no jobs for line 2. All units were scheduled for line 1 and there were no jobs to swap to line 2. Only 4 X 2's can schedule down line 2 and all we had in the stacker were 4 X 4's. The HK system (stacker) shuts down if it asks for a particular type of unit and none is available. From what I understand, a supplier had problems shipping parts for 4 X 2's so the mix was flooded with 4 X 4's, What part? Dunno....Are the parts on the way? Dunno...Just explaining why the mix in the stacker is more important than the number of jobs in the stacker. Technically, he had it backwards...only 4x4's go down line 2. Line 2 does not run 4x2's or DRW's (I think...) This mix constraint is a residual effect of our old buddy Todd Bryant. He was a genius.
|
|
|
Post by ktpschd on Mar 3, 2011 13:34:43 GMT -5
ktpsparky: You are absolutely right, I did reverse my line 1 and line 2 explanation. Thanks for setting it straight. And you are correct that DRW's do not go down line 2. The point I was trying to make was of the mix being more important than the number of jobs.
|
|
|
Post by ktpstak on Mar 3, 2011 13:51:55 GMT -5
You got it right ktpsparky. The vendor is having problems supplying enough 4x4's, so Detroit is filling in with 4x2's. This starves Line 2 of jobs available from the stacker. Hearing a couple more days to line it out and then our daily orders coming in should be balanced again.
|
|