|
|
Post by keithf on Oct 22, 2010 7:56:29 GMT -5
i still cant believe he got elected.
|
|
|
|
Post by keithf on Oct 22, 2010 15:30:57 GMT -5
i still cant believe he got elected. I cant believe the UAW leaders mentality to back this guy. Just 5 short years ago, in his own words, he described both our plants as a nuisance to the environment. He never had anything good to say about Ford or the UAW until he threw his hat in the ring to run in the senate race. And to this day, that worthless mother fucker still drives a piece of shit Lexus! Thanks again UAW leadership for backing this c0ck sucker! without rhyme or reason, the UAW backs whoever has a "D" after their name on the ballot. apparently, those with a "D" after their name are the only people for "working families"...whatever that means. |
|
|
|
Post by uknowit on Oct 22, 2010 16:31:24 GMT -5
you are right vote rand paul and vote yourself out of a job
|
|
|
|
Post by keithf on Oct 22, 2010 16:37:36 GMT -5
you are right vote rand paul and vote yourself out of a job okay, here is an attempt at an honest discussion. how is voting for rand paul gonna cost someone their job? for the record, i dont live in the district and cant vote for either. |
|
|
|
Post by kessinger on Oct 25, 2010 8:52:49 GMT -5
Notice the video cuts off before he finishes his answer. This speech was well before the vote on healthcare. NOT AFTER. He was being....oh what do they call it?..............HONEST. At that time he did not knwo exactly how they were going to pay for it. He then went on to explain what they were proposing. Here is the Couriers take on it, I could not find the exact speech language.
As follows:
"The question is, 'How we going to pay for this?' The answer is, 'I don't know,'" Yarmuth said.
The congressman did say Congress is proposing to pay for the health care proposal with about $500 billion.
Some of that money would be a surcharge on the taxes of people making more than $500,000 a year and the other half would be paid for with cuts in programs such as Medicare Advantage.
"He changed my mind a little bit. I am more in favor of single payer option than I was before," attendee Karen Hremer said.
Yarmuth said the public option would set up the same provider network as insurance companies and wouldn't force the existing insurance companies out of business.
"We spend in this country, billions and billions of dollars every year on bottled water and we have a pretty good public option to that -- its turn on your tap. People still buy public water, they still buy bottled water," Yarmuth said.
As for where Yarmuth stands when a vote will be taken -- he said he still hasn't made up his mind.
"I'm concerned about ultimate results for the American people. How we get there, we're going to do it the best way we can," Yarmuth said.
The congressman voted for a health care overhaul approved by the House Ways and Means Committee this summer. That proposal includes a public insurance option that would compete against private insurance companies.
Your right you shoudl not vote for a guy that is being honest. The video clip is soo much better than the whole story.
|
|
|
|
Post by kessinger on Oct 25, 2010 17:12:46 GMT -5
I think Yarmuth can be too liberal on some issues. I like that Pence over here in Indiana stuck to his guns about spending. I disagree with him on a lot but am glad to see he was a true believer, unlike McConnell. Reagan was good for the American economy, and so was Clinton. Carter and Bush 1 and 2 , not so much.
See in there Anal how I can tell the difference between good and bad despite the R or D. Can you? Do you think you will agree with any politician all the time? Yarmuth was for auto bailout. Good. He is for higher emmision standards. Bad. He said he would vote for health care even if it cost him the election. A ballsy call either way you feel about it, I'll give him credit for that.
Rand wants less spending. Good. He wants a national sales tax. Bad. He thinks we are the reason the Big 3 were unprofitable. And that is pure ignorance.
Can you do the same? Or was Clintons economy just Newts? Was Obamas expansion of gun owners rights just pressure from the NRA? Was Rands quote gotcha journalism? do you agree with him? Do you just believe the Right is always right? It sure seems so.
I only vote on one issue, my job. All these other things mean nothing without that to me. So thats pretty much what guides my vote. If I want to expand my gun rights. If i am working I'll buy more guns. If I want Christianity to grow, ill work more and give money to my church. And I feel, and think history proves, that in most cases, my job here at Ford benefits more often under Dem leadership. If that changes my vote will change. As I have stated I would have voted for Pat B. I voted for Northup once and regretted it, voted for Ross Perot. I am sure I will vote for more R's and a few I's in the future.
Been here 15 yrs this month and I have gotten more and bigger checks under the D's than the R's. that is a fact you can't get around. Those pesky facts can ruin a good argument.
|
|
|
|
Post by kessinger on Oct 26, 2010 7:46:38 GMT -5
So the answer is yes, you always think the right is right.
Take note the link is to an Editorial, they list no name sof sources, looks liek another straw man issue put up by your folks.
In your Conservative debate style claiming I said one thign when I said another. I never said Obmama was pro gun. I said he expanded gun right. That is not an editorial or a maybe, he DID. You can now carry them in national parks which has been banned for years. Again give me some facts to your arguement.
And how do you vote for your country? Every vote in your country is for your country. This your wierd way of trying to claim someone isn't a patriot.
But for the record. Me feeding my kids and keeping a roof over their heads comes before all else. And I need to work to do that.
I guess you can consider me a traitor for that if it makes you feel better.
|
|
|
|
Post by elmer on Oct 26, 2010 8:51:41 GMT -5
i still cant believe he got elected. I cant believe the UAW leaders mentality to back this guy. Just 5 short years ago, in his own words, he described both our plants as a nuisance to the environment. He never had anything good to say about Ford or the UAW until he threw his hat in the ring to run in the senate race. And to this day, that worthless mother fucker still drives a piece of shit Lexus! Thanks again UAW leadership for backing this c0ck sucker! could you post that vidoe of him saying that? if not i understand. |
|
|
|
Post by ktpelec on Oct 26, 2010 9:13:23 GMT -5
The LEO is certainly a top credited news source! LOL
Great posts Kessinger!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2010 9:58:32 GMT -5
The LEO is certainly a top credited news source! LOL Great posts Kessinger! Yakmouth printed his own editorials .. |
|
|
|
Post by ktpelec on Oct 26, 2010 10:15:11 GMT -5
The LEO is certainly a top credited news source! LOL Great posts Kessinger! Again, you come up with stupid shit replies. Yakmouth printed his own editorials you tard. Again you resort to juvenile, curse words when anyone posts anything other than your point of view. Doesn't that get old? |
|
|
|
Post by ScottR@KTP on Oct 26, 2010 15:08:25 GMT -5
analspasm...many enjoy the constant debate you create, but please do not resort to name calling or offensive posts. Your reply is still visible in ktpelec's post. If there is not two opposing opinions, this forum would not exist (political). I am all for barbing one another, but let us all do it in a respectable manner. Continue...  Life is good! |
|
|
|
Post by marcus on Oct 26, 2010 16:12:52 GMT -5
LEO is pure trash
|
|
|
|
Post by buckeyeinky on Nov 3, 2010 3:23:30 GMT -5
Scott thats typical of a tea bag party republican who's only thoughts are what fox news tells him. when faced with facts just yell, get mad , and curse , just like bill oreilly. watch fox news for 1 hour a day and you will know exactly what talking points any tea bag republican will bitch about.
|
|
|
|
Post by buckeyeinky on Nov 3, 2010 3:27:43 GMT -5
HEY kessinger
did analspasm put in his papers to quit the socialist party better know as the uaw yet ?
|
|
|
|
Post by lucero on Nov 3, 2010 3:54:07 GMT -5
HA HA HA!! that wanna-be Ken doll Jack Conway is outta here!
|
|
|
|
Post by elmer on Nov 3, 2010 6:25:30 GMT -5
HA HA HA!! that wanna-be Ken doll Jack Conway is outta here! He was never in there so now go home and get tea bagged! |
|
|
|
Post by axleman on Nov 3, 2010 9:18:17 GMT -5
you are right vote rand paul and vote yourself out of a job Oh no, Rand is in now where do we sign up for unemployment? Look out UAW the big bad "Aqua Buddha" is gonna get you! FEAR THE BUDDHA!!! LOL |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2010 10:44:29 GMT -5
Scott thats typical of a tea bag party republican who's only thoughts are what fox news tells him. when faced with facts just yell, get mad , and curse , just like bill oreilly. watch fox news for 1 hour a day and you will know exactly what talking points any tea bag republican will bitch about. Look in the mirror latley? HEY kessinger did analspasm put in his papers to quit the socialist party better know as the uaw yet ? Nope still here, paying dues. Wouldnt give you the satisfaction. HA HA HA!! that wanna-be Ken doll Jack Conway is outta here! He was never in there so now go home and get tea bagged! So, you are saying you want someone to put their testicles in his mouth? Yea, that's really being grown up, huh? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2010 10:53:43 GMT -5
Only other thing I can say is "I wish all of our elected officials the best of luck and I hope they make the best decisions for Ky."
|
|
|
|
Post by lucero on Nov 3, 2010 16:58:46 GMT -5
HA HA HA!! that wanna-be Ken doll Jack Conway is outta here! He was never in there so now go home and get tea bagged! You volunteering for the job elmer? ;D |
|
|
|
Post by buckeyeinky on Nov 3, 2010 19:57:00 GMT -5
its not for my satisfaction. you are the one who against socialism in all form and since the uaw is socialism you should stand by your beliefs and go work for a non union non socialism work place. thats all i am saying be proud of your beliefs
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2010 8:10:56 GMT -5
its not for my satisfaction. you are the one who against socialism in all form and since the uaw is socialism you should stand by your beliefs and go work for a non union non socialism work place. thats all i am saying be proud of your beliefs Lol! Sarcasm at its finest. |
|
|
|
Post by buckeyeinky on Nov 5, 2010 7:16:53 GMT -5
no i am not tauting you. you just proving my point .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 5, 2010 7:23:24 GMT -5
no i am not tauting you. you just proving my point . Ok, if it makes you feel better.  |
|
|
|
Post by buckeyeinky on Nov 5, 2010 16:50:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by keithf on Nov 7, 2010 9:40:54 GMT -5
what benefits are reaped from socialism? |
|
|
|
Post by buckeyeinky on Nov 8, 2010 14:42:01 GMT -5
$27 hrs with benefits =uaw , cops , fire dept. , public schools ,roads and bridges , unemployment , social security , medicare .
|
|
|
|
Post by keithf on Nov 8, 2010 16:20:07 GMT -5
$27 hrs with benefits =uaw , cops , fire dept. , public schools ,roads and bridges , unemployment , social security , medicare . our wages are not an example of socialism, nor are our benefits. and if you think social security, medicare, and unemployment come out in your favor........ |
|
|
|
Post by buckeyeinky on Nov 8, 2010 22:55:53 GMT -5
collective bargining is socialism = our wages and benefit, uaw is a form of socialism , that why the republicans HATE union. and i guess you didnt collect unemployment the last 2 years right ?
what do you mean about ss and medicare
|
|
